Immi Flow vs Migro: case workflow or document specialist?

Disclosure: Immi Flow publishes this comparison. Details and prices were checked on 1 October 2026 using both vendors' public pages. We did not test Migro or interview its customers. Confirm current terms directly with each vendor.

Immi Flow and Migro both address migration practices that spend time checking documents. Migro presents a specialist AI document-assessment product with an intake widget. Immi Flow places document review inside a broader matter workflow from enquiry to lodgement readiness.

Investigate Migro when existing practice software works well and you want a focused document-analysis layer. Investigate Immi Flow when document review needs to sit beside intake, agreements, document chasing, billing, and a matter record.

At a glance

What Migro advertises

Migro says users can upload a client document bundle and receive a dashboard in under two minutes. It says the product cross-references files against subclass requirements and identifies missing, expired, or inconsistent material. The public page lists subclasses including 189, 190, 491, 482, 820, 186, 500, and 600.

Migro also offers an embeddable Intake Agent for website enquiries. Starter includes 10 free credits. Pro is advertised at A$199 per month and includes Document Intelligence, Intake Agent, all visa subclasses, a 12-month dashboard history, and integrations.

These are vendor claims. Test the subclasses and document types your practice handles.

What Immi Flow advertises

Immi Flow describes a matter path covering enquiry, service agreements, portal-based document collection, source-linked findings, and practitioner approval. Its pricing page also lists billing, consent capture, and a sealed audit export.

The starting price is A$99 per registered agent per month excluding GST, with support staff included. Higher plans add capacity and integrations.

Compare document output on the same bundle

Prepare a bundle with two applicants and one sponsor, an expired passport, inconsistent employment dates, a missing page, a translated document, an irrelevant file, and a corrected client answer.

Ask each product to show:

1. Which requirements or checklist items it used.
2. Which document and page supports each finding.
3. How it reports uncertainty or unreadable text.
4. Whether it links facts across people and files.
5. How staff correct a result without hiding the original.
6. What the RMA approves and what enters the permanent record.
7. How to export the source, finding, correction, and approval together.

Case workflow around the review

A document dashboard may solve the immediate review problem while the practice keeps its existing CRM, billing system, and client portal. That can work when tools exchange enough information and staff know which system owns each record.

Immi Flow aims to keep more of the journey in one matter. Run a matter from enquiry through export instead of testing document upload alone.

For Migro, test how the review result reaches the client file in your existing system. Its Pro page lists connections to Claude, n8n, Make, and Zapier, with API access available on request. Confirm which data moves and which system retains final approval.

Data handling and consent

Migro says client documents and AI processing stay in Google Cloud's Sydney region and that it uses Vertex AI with zero data retention. Immi Flow advertises Sydney primary database hosting and consent records. Those statements describe different parts of a data flow.

Ask both vendors for subprocessors, retention periods, deletion behaviour, backup locations, and cross-border transfers through email or integrations. OMARA's AI guidance says an RMA remains responsible for AI-assisted information and needs written consent before entering client personal details into an AI system.

Price comparison

Migro Pro is advertised at A$199 per month. Immi Flow starts at A$99 per registered agent per month excluding GST. Comparing those figures directly can mislead because Migro sells focused document and intake tools while Immi Flow sells a broader matter workflow.

Estimate cost using expected matters, agents, support staff, integrations, and any practice software that remains necessary.

Trial Migro first when a working case-management system needs a specialist document layer. Trial Immi Flow first when document chasing and review are tied to wider intake and matter-record problems. Trial both when document quality decides the purchase.

Start with one matter in Immi Flow.