Immi Flow

Best migration agent software in Australia: a 2026 buyer's guide

What migration agent software should an Australian practice evaluate in 2026?

The right migration agent software depends on the practice's main bottleneck. Immi Flow emphasises source-linked evidence review, LodgeHQ broad practice management and ImmiAccount autofill, ImmiIQ research and sponsor workflows, Migration Manager established application automation and accounting, Officio questionnaires and form workflows, ImmiDesk modular practice management, and Ezymigrate multi-country case work. Shortlist by workflow, then test every product with the same representative matter.

Disclosure: Immi Flow publishes this comparison and appears in it. Product details and prices were checked on 1 October 2026 using vendors' public pages. We did not test the products or interview their customers. Confirm current terms directly with each vendor.

“Case management software” covers many kinds of work in a migration practice. A busy lodgement team may want to stop re-entering client details. A solo registered migration agent may be trying to keep documents and file notes in order. A firm with employer sponsors may need to track obligations across a sponsored workforce. The right shortlist depends on which job is taking the most time.

Here are seven products to investigate: Immi Flow, LodgeHQ, ImmiIQ, Migration Manager, Officio, ImmiDesk, and Ezymigrate. Treat these suggestions as a way to plan demos, not as performance rankings.

For a map of the different jobs these products cover, read what software an Australian migration practice needs.

Where to start

Your main needStart by looking atPublic positioning
Source-linked document findings and practitioner reviewImmi FlowDocument collection, cited findings, consent records, and an approval gate
Broad practice administration with ImmiAccount autofillLodgeHQClient portal, case workflow, billing, form tools, and a browser extension
Occupation research or sponsor workflowsImmiIQMigration CRM and research tools, with sponsor and eLodgement add-ons
Established application automation and accountingMigration ManagerApplication workflows, batch VEVO, record keeping, and trust accounting
Questionnaires and tiered form workflowsOfficioCore case tools, with portals and ImmiXpress on higher plans
Modular Australian practice operationsImmiDeskCase and document management in published staff and module tiers
Cases across more than one countryEzymigrateImmigration CRM workflows across Australia and other jurisdictions

The table reflects what vendors say their products do. If one feature will determine your choice, ask to see it work on a matter like yours.

Decide what you need to test

Start with a recent matter that took more staff time than expected. Where did work stall?

  1. Could staff turn the enquiry into a matter, issue a service agreement, and see who owned the next action?
  2. Did the client know which documents were missing? Could staff tell which applicant, dependant, or sponsor each file belonged to?
  3. If software extracted a date or suggested a finding, could the practitioner inspect the source, correct the result, and record approval?
  4. Did the product prepare information, fill fields in ImmiAccount, or both? Who reviewed and submitted the application?
  5. After closing the matter, could the practice retrieve correspondence, file notes, agreements, documents, and decisions? Could it export the file if it changed systems?
  6. What would the whole team pay? Count seats, contract term, setup, storage, messages, AI use, and form-filling add-ons.

The record and review questions have a regulatory reason. The Migration Agents Code of Conduct requires registered migration agents to keep contemporaneous records of oral communications and maintain client files. Section 56 sets a seven-year retention period from the last action on a file. OMARA's AI guidance says an RMA remains responsible for information given with AI assistance and needs written consent before entering a client's personal details into an AI system.

Seven products to consider

1. Immi Flow: evidence preparation with practitioner sign-off

Immi Flow's pricing page describes case management, document collection, citation-linked extraction, PAM3 readiness checks, practitioner review, AI consent records, and a sealed audit export. Its Solo plan is advertised at A$99 per registered agent per month excluding GST, with unlimited support staff.

If collecting and checking evidence takes too much of your team's time, put that workflow at the centre of the demo. Ask the practitioner to trace a finding back to its source before approving it. Immi Flow says it does not lodge applications or replace ImmiAccount, so include the final handoff in your test.

2. LodgeHQ: a broad toolkit and form-entry speed

LodgeHQ advertises a client portal, case pipeline, billing, document extraction, service agreements, a trust ledger, and numerous document and workflow utilities. It also offers a Chrome extension that fills ImmiAccount fields for practitioner review; LodgeHQ says the practitioner still submits. Its public price is A$99 per registered agent per month plus GST, or A$948 annually, with unlimited support staff.

For a team that repeatedly enters client data, test the extension on the actual subclasses and forms it uses. Try an incomplete answer, a client correction, multi-entry sections, and an interrupted session. Then test evidence review separately.

3. ImmiIQ: research tools and sponsor workflows

ImmiIQ's pricing page lists occupation and pathway research, CRM, case management, document tools, and a client portal. Its Pro plan is advertised at A$49 per month when billed annually at A$588. ImmiAccount eLodgement and the Sponsor Portal are paid Pro add-ons; Enterprise includes them.

ImmiIQ may be worth evaluating if the practice does frequent occupation and pathway research or manages sponsored employees. Put an applicant case and a sponsor workflow through the demo, and confirm which plan or add-on contains each capability.

4. Migration Manager: established automation and accounting

Migration Manager is an established Australian immigration platform that advertises application automation, questionnaires, a client portal, batch VEVO, record keeping, and trust accounting. Its public pricing lists A$339 per licence per month on a 12-month term or A$259 on a 24-month term, excluding GST, plus an A$900 professional setup and training fee.

Ask which application types can be automated, how support staff are licensed, and what is involved in moving data into or out of the platform. Compare the full contract cost rather than the monthly licence alone.

5. Officio: questionnaires and staged form tools

Officio lists client and case management, questionnaires, document management, and collaboration for migration practices. On its plan page, client and employer portals appear on Pro. ImmiXpress, VEVO checking, e-signatures, and time billing appear on Ultimate. Numeric prices were not visible in the readable public page when checked.

If structured questionnaires matter to your team, have staff complete one and follow the answers into a form. Check the resulting client file and record history, then obtain a written quote for the plan containing the required tools.

6. ImmiDesk: modular Australian practice management

ImmiDesk advertises A$69 per month for one staff user, A$149 for three staff users, and A$599 for unlimited staff, excluding GST. Its plans vary by modules and storage as well as staff capacity.

The published tiers make ImmiDesk an option to examine when the practice wants a daily operational system with a known team size. List the modules and integrations needed, then confirm the exact plan.

7. Ezymigrate: multi-country immigration practices

Ezymigrate describes an immigration CRM covering cases, documents, communications, accounting, and workflows across Australia and other jurisdictions. Its public site says pricing scales with practice size and is available by enquiry. Some agentic case-processing capabilities are labelled as part of its 2026 roadmap, so distinguish current features from planned ones during a demo.

For a practice working across jurisdictions, ask Ezymigrate to demonstrate Australian matter types alongside its other workflows. Get both the price and the scope of any data migration in writing.

How to make a shortlist

Choose two or three products that appear to address the main bottleneck, then use the same test matter in each demo. Include more than one person, several document types, a corrected client answer, and an incomplete item. Have support staff prepare the matter and the responsible practitioner review it.

Check the result against five questions:

  • Can everyone see what is still missing and who owns the next action?
  • Can the practitioner find the original source for a field or AI finding?
  • Does a correction flow through the matter without hiding earlier decisions?
  • Can the practice produce a coherent file record and export it?
  • Does the quoted plan cover every staff member and workflow used in the test?

Keep ImmiAccount in the test. It is the Department's online application system, and each external product handles preparation or field entry differently. Ask the vendor to show the handoff before the practitioner submits.

Which is best for a solo RMA?

Start with the task that costs the most time each week. For evidence collection and review, try Immi Flow. For ImmiAccount data entry and broad practice tools, try LodgeHQ. ImmiDesk publishes a one-user price for daily administration; ImmiIQ is worth considering for occupation research. Use the same matter in each trial and compare the records you can retrieve afterward.

Does any product replace ImmiAccount?

No product in this guide replaces the Department's system. Home Affairs describes ImmiAccount as its online application service. Other products may prepare information or fill fields in a browser. Ask who checks the completed application and how the practitioner submits it.

What about AI document review?

Several vendors advertise document extraction or AI review. Give them the same document bundle. Check which document and page supports each finding, how a mistake is corrected, and whether the responsible practitioner approves the result before use. OMARA says the RMA remains professionally responsible when using AI.

If evidence collection and practitioner review take too much time in your practice, start with one matter in Immi Flow.

Sources

Last reviewed: 2026-10-01